Life Through My Eyes: An attempt at verse and writings from my scattered mind

The Poetry Corner

Cold Hands

Published: December 25, 2025

The days are cold, so cold
The sky, laid out like cement walls—
All the while old cement edifices lay Strewn out like torn rags.
In this grayness no silver looms.

No lining, that which stays on the precipice of precious, 
Lives in these paper days—
We work till knuckles are also grey
Bare chest, can't fight cold.

The days are cold, so cold
The artist's hand lies like rubble's child
Inert, not even waiting to thaw.
The pen isn't picked up nor the brush stroked
In these late days.

Dive Bar Blue

Published: December 18, 2025

There's some pictures behind the bar
Of old men—legends and stars
Black and white—
Though more white, bleached than black.

There's a man at the bar.
Pitcher full of ale—
The mug is cracked
And his conversation's stale.

The Bartender is old
But, none the wiser—
He hits on the hookers and whores.
His black eye ain't a reminder.

The sign outside's flickering
Blue, neon green, spent—
It's seen better days.
Though the worst is yet to come.

The bartender, the whores and the man—
They know something ain't right.
But they choose to drink;
Party, forget—long into the night.

Sonnet for You

Published: December 25, 2025

I have been to the edges of night,
Where starry skies meet waters stilled.
Have tried to be with the great birds in flight,
But even their ballads are no match for thine song and lilt. 

I have beaten shining knights at noon;
Eaten at roundtables with lords and drank at stables with farm hands.
But at night thou comest into my dreams— spectral pale and I swoon.
Thou art to me more than jewels of the ocean and lands.

Those are lines from my poems of you,
Though reality is less refined, dressed in banality,
I can't even muster the courage to say how do you do—
So I choose to live in fantasies of such ideality.

Whether a knight or merely a young man, one thing is true—
I do swoon when I see you in my dreams or when you enter a room.

O Life!

Published: December 25, 2025

O Life!
I thought I had lived,
In darkness, led astray.
I have spent my days
With vagabonds and lepers—
The best of the lot.

O Life!
I have not seen you,
In splendor during my stay 
The setting sun bid farewell—
Not even its final colors
Met my imagination.

O Life!
I come to it at last
I have—
Seen many sights,
Have drank and reveled.
But I have not realised.

O life!
At the end of all roads,
I have not seen your cruelty—
The hunger or thirst.
The sweetest nectar was dull to me
For it was all I had known.

A Show

Published: December 25, 2025

A flower is like a matinee show
Awaiting its hour, its chance.
Transcendent— few may say but
Plain and dull to the driven masses.

Stop a second, come, see the show.
The first act is a seed—
A pit, though not of despair
Yet planted deep like a heart's sorrow.

The second act— in green shade.
Grows long and stands quite proud;
Though its pride is dressed in leaves—
It bends but does not yield.

The third act is most revered, the petals spring forth.
Beautiful, red, almost like the stars.
But beauty is short lived in this world.
Even it must end— make way.
End.

Dreamland

Published: December 18, 2025

We saw birds in the sky,
I looked into your eyes
I saw love,
For the sky itself—
So blue,
Home of the free birds—
Sometimes purple, 
Rarely red.

We went to the circus,
The ringmaster's red robe—
You said you loved it.
You were clapping: 
As they tamed wild animals.
I heard joy—
In your laughter
So free, so Beautiful.

I saw you looking 
Out the window,
Staring at the bees—
Lost in thought.
You always did like bees,
They remind me 
Of you—
Wild and unique.

I think,
You love the birds,
The circus,
And the bees
Because—
they are like you.
Free,
Unbothered.

I know,
You love me.
Though it's not the same—
As, I love you.
In dreamland—
You are mine.
We love each other
One and the same.

I wish I could tell you
How I feel,
How I love you as you love
The birds or the bees.
But for now,
The different kind of love
You have for me
 Will be enough, my friend.

Talking 2025 Blues

Published: November 26, 2025

A talking blues song is a type of folk song where the performer half-speaks, half-sings in a rambling, conversational style, often blending humor, social commentary, and personal storytelling.

Well, I woke up early
got my shirt
Label said,
"Made in Bangladesh"
In some sweatshop.
I went downstairs
And kissed my girl.

I looked out the window,
Ain't no bird in sight—
Where's the snow?
I guess I ain't seen a deer—
Been a few years.
But I was feeling cold
'Cause the AC's always on.

I put the hot coffee on—
"Nescafe" is the brand we drink.
I just took my cup 
And drank my blood coffee.
And I opened my phone,
Read about children
Dying in Gaza and Sudan.

Then I checked my mail,
"93 unread" — my inbox said.
Zero when I went to bed.
They work me like a rat,
Wish I could take a bat to
Their head.
But, I need the peanuts they pay me in.

Then I ran.
Got in my car.
Electric Vehicle — Real quiet
Made in the U.S.A.
By an immigrant—
Who'll lynch you,
If you ain't white.

I laughed,
 'Cause even the car's got a voice—
It asked me about my day.
I had nothing to say,
Never felt so lonely.
So I put on a podcast,
Anything to take my mind.

Podcast guys said,
"The raptures coming"
I know he got his second rolex—
Since the last time he talked
'Bout some judgement day.
Ain't no hell or heaven,
this was all we got.

On the way to work
I saw marches,
With their big signs and torches
I never could keep up.
They think we stand a chance
But we are all slaves
To corporate greed.

Yeah, I just wear my tie
And do what I'm told—
Don't know if my heart exists,
My body's gone cold.
But I do matter
'Cause the state's always watching me.

Notes on Death

Published: November 20, 2025

I think people don’t truly ever die in a sense — they exist in memory and their "essence" exists in the air and the plants that grow.

When we die, 
We shall be elevated.
We leave behind,
This vessel—
to be swallowed,
Blood, bone and sinew.

Life is but a tingle,
A twitch of the sciatic nerve.
But in death,
We become so much more—
To die is to be born again,
A god of many patrons.

Death is the wind,
At your back in summer.
The soil that births 
The red Dhak.
The brief memory,
That brings back the dead.
        

Two Loves – An Adaption of a Irish Folk Song

Published: November 15, 2025

This poem draws inspiration from the Irish folk song The Wind That Shakes the Barley by Robert Dwyer Joyce. Though not set in Ireland, it borrows the spirit and certain lines of that song, attempting to "inherit" its emotional cadence and folk-lyrics while reimagining it within a different landscape.

I sat me in a valley dry
And watched the sunrise,
Yellow fields shook in the wind,
The last of the barley.

I was torn between two loves-
The old love and the new love.
The old for the farm,
Now dry and set to rot.

But I had seen her at noon,
Mistress of the valley-
And I loved her,
For her memory.

The new for that land,
Which gave me my pride.
It was a man's love-
Love for my country,

Now thrall in foreign chains.
The farm, forebearer's stead,
had given me shelter,
But she gave me spirit.

Love for love, I wept,
The farm kept us warm.
But to me t'was coward's warmth
In the distance, I could hear cannon's cry.

I woke up in the night,
Barley burning, embers flying-
The hounds had set fire to the old farm.
But blood for grain, sabre for smoke.

Ash and dust, spread out;
I found myself without a home-
Yet heart remained,
And I vowed on memory of golden fields,

For love of my land,
We fought from glen to hollows dark-
Sabres agleam, cannon's black smoke
But at last, the invaders were in a rout,

I sat me in a valley green
And watched the sunset,
Yellow fields shook in the wind,
The first of the barley.
        

Draconid

Published: November 2, 2025

Another one of my own poems which I like. The dragon I like to imagine was not surpassed by many.

I bid farewell to the old dragon's den.

Where the waters shone and fell like the stars of heaven's unseen fields.

Her hollow from rock face to gorge was my cosmos, exhausted and spent.

The dragon, her great spine like stalactite had long ago keeled.

Yet under her heavy wing of celestial might was my abode.

Where I slept hand on heart, & heart lost in dreams of Gaia and Uranus.

There, I imagined the tapestry of the stars and how the stellar-spine in the sky, milky-white flowed.

I never saw the dragon, alive with wings stretched from land to heaven's end but I imagine, Nec Pluribus Impar
                            

The Horsemen

Published: November 14, 2025

A poem about the futile nature of war and an elegy to the dead

The horsemen at zenith-
Shining under the unbending sun,
Know not what grave deeds await.

The horsemen charge in the pale afternoon,
The clarion cries out clear;
Let Battle's fury take them.

The horsemen at nadir,
See through the red mist and dust-
Their kin fallen on barren soil, horses gone.

The horsemen lie in the silent night,
Bloodied hand on bare chest-
Restless yet asleep 'neath cold starlight.

The horseman at dawn,
Rests at last-
His fey spirit awaiting the silence of eternity.
                            

To Art.

Published: November 27, 2025

A letter to a child's drawing.

When
We are children,
They tell us
To pursue the arts.
"Draw Child"
Says the mother—
Child at knee height
Holding on to her pleat.

Perhaps,
He would draw—
A reindeer
Or a motorcar,
Or scribbles
And leave it there
Or,
Would he write?

Those,
Are not the questions
Asked of him.
He is asked
about math—
A noble pursuit.
But not,
The heart of man.

When,
We are older
They tell us
To work till knuckles—white.
"An aged man has duties"
You say to yourself
Holding on,
To old, bleached images.

But, do they matter?
No, my dear— "They do not."
Pennies will not clink when you are gone,
Nor will a motorcar start.
Your love will go on,
So will your art—
For they are
Child's work.

Sands

Published: November 2, 2025

An ode to surviving despite hardship and the futile nature of the world.

What news do you bring from the land of sands, O Bedouin, O bedouin?

The Oases bear no date palms, and my child died in my arm last eve.

Why do you cry dear musafir , what sorrow haunts your tale?

My camel- his knees bear no strenght, yet I shall carry on alone. 

Why do you close your eyes my beloved wayfarer, what is it you wish not to see?

I wish to see the world in creation deep but I lost my keffiyeh and the shamal's sand shall get in my eyes

Who do you pray for ummi, clenching your rosary harder than your children?

I pray for safe passage of my child across the desert harsh.
                            

Seabird

Published: November 2, 2025

Perhaps the only one of my poems I like.

Out of the green sea, she rose-
A nymph from a man's story,
She was like the purple twilight at day's close.
She longed to fly, to the edge of the sea.

Yet, her dream disappears like seafoam left to dry,
Never touching the nest of the albatross.
She remains an old sailor's shanty-
But can she ever cross?
                            

Signs

Published: November 2, 2025

My miserably failed attempt at surrealist poetry. This one is also political in stance, but I shall leave it up to the reader to decide.

I found myself in front of a hospital bed.
In the dim light, I asked him him his name-
He said, "Woody"
And tried to point to his string set.

I found myself in a ring.
The man said "Cassius" was his name.
But his rhymes felt rude
I think he lost his wings.

I found myself in front of an oracle,
He said his name was "George" .
And he went off about some big brother of his-
I called him mad.

I found myself in front of a sign-
Sign was red and bronzer stained.
Then, it all started to make sense,
I think I chose the sinner's saint.
                            

Revolution?

Published: November 2, 2025

I tried to write within the folk tradition, but it is a bit hypocritical considering my privileged background. I think this is my most political poem/song.

Well you better not tarry.
You better meet their gaze.
You better look into the valley.
And see them looking back at your face. 

You see their pain, you call it anger.
You hear their shouts, you call it envy.
You don't see their hunger.
Your waters run muddy. 

You sit behind your private glass house and sip on your whiskey.
While they stand out in the rain,
And their voices get raspy.
But you ain't gonna let them put a stain on your name. 

So you look into that valley again.
You see them gather but you dont care.
You think they're insane-
They can't touch a single hair on you. 

You know, they ain't gonna fight for long.
They gotta survive....
They're gonna go back to the mines and sing their worker's songs.
But you, you can't sleep at night in your cashmere sheets, long as you're alive.
                            

Night Vagabond

Published: November 2, 2025

A thought I had which I wrote down in verse

You ever wonder where their bodies go?
When they die on the pavement in the scalding night.
I know they bury their children-
But who remains to bury them?


The vagabonds, the lepers and the fakirs,
The night was theirs.
But who mourns them?
When the night swallows them- bone and sinew...
                            

Pieces

Published: November 2, 2025

Every piece hit the ground, and a murmur followed. 

Like- a jigsaw puzzle in reverse. 

With each fall, he felt more hollow- 

but resigned to his fate, there was no one he could curse.
                            

Rock Opera Alley

Published: November 2, 2025

Trigger Warning: This poem contains sensitive material related to mental distress and self-harm. If you are affected, consider seeking support from local resources.

I guess I tried to write like early 60s Dylan here. The main character isn't anyone in particular, I think of it as an amalgam of the dread of modern life.

He's writing a rock opera.
But it just ain't good.
He's trying to use his camera.
But the people- they just ain't in the mood.

He goes home and he goes to bed.
But his socks they just ain't clean.
He thinks of the lady in red.
And he- he falls asleep thinking he's in a scene.

A scene? The only scene he's in is obscene.
He wakes up and he thinks he's advanced.
But he can't find his denim jeans.
The girls-they just don't give him a chance.

He goes to the rally.
But he gets blocked by the crowd.
He doesn't have a white picket fence so he stands in the alley.
The game- he just can't play it so loud.

He goes to the bank and he takes out a loan.
He looks in the mirror, thinks his life's a bust. 
And back home he loads the chamber.
The world- it just wont bother him no more.
                            

Institution

Published: November 2, 2025

I hear the sound of trains pass me by,
As I wander through these halls-
Hallowed ground for few, and for many a cause of sigh.
The doctors, they make me feel small.

Madmen, wildmen- are they my company?
I see them and think of myself as different,
But even they think me funny;
The mirror on the wall paints me as a demented haggard in a downward descent.

The mirrors i call my eyes reflect otherwise.
I was not always like this- 
A revolutionary I think I used to be, I fought for those, who are smaller in size.
I never failed to rise to the occasion and I never let a just cause die.

Perhaps that is why they caught me and severed my brain-
Did I try to resist it-that memory escapes my mind.
They tried to make me another cart in the train,
But they left my heart behind. 

Today I broke free of my chains-
No longer am I their thrall.
I see them searching for me-even in the storm drains;
But they do not know I wander through their halls.

But I feel my fight is all for naught
How long shall I wander?
Is everything fraught?
Is the chair my only respite- I ponder
                            

Essays and Commentary

Greenwich Village

Published: November 2, 2025 | Category: Music Commentary

A critical look at the narrative that a single artist ended the thriving folk scene in Greenwich Village.

To say Bob Dylan was the death of the Greenwich village folk scene is reductionist. It reduces the vibrant 20 year folk tradition of that neighborhood to just the play theatre of a superstar in infancy.
The greenwich folk scene had existed and had been the voice of counterculture for a decade or more when Dylan arrived, and kept existing and evolving until the mid 70s. Yes, Dylan's contribution to that neighborhood's musicality is certainly unignorable and Dylan did have a hand in its fate. But Dylan's superstardom and shift to electric guitar did not kill the folk scene.
                            

My thoughts on Inside Llewyn Davis

Published: November 2, 2025 | Category: Film Commentary

An analysis of the Coen Brothers' folk odyssey, focusing on the symbolism of the cats, the cyclical narrative structure, and the ultimate acceptance of life's mediocrity.

My interpretation of inside llewyn davis is that its a personal journey of healing or accepting. The first scene being a cryptic version of the last scene is perhaps a reference to traditional folk song structures. The way at the end Llewyn doesn't repeat his past mistake of letting the cat out, and then him managing to sing the duet alone is a sign of him accepting the death of his partner/friend at last. I like how the movie can be interpreted in so many ways. Him being overshadowed by Dylan's arrival and him saying "Au revoir" at the end may seem bleak. But to me, its a suggestion that he has accepted his lot in life. I think the ending is trying to say that mediocrity isn't necessarily a bad thing. But, in Llewyn's personal life, the movie ends with most of his relationships being good, suggesting that no matter he shunned people away, they still love him. The Gorfeins forgive him and bring him back into their home, Jean gets him the opening/final scene gig(no matter how she got it) and him trying to go back to the merchant marines is him accepting that his father's life of mediocrity wasn't such a a bad thing after all.

I think the cat(s) represent Llewyn. The tom cat escapes at the start but Llewyn manages to catch him but then it leaves Llewyn's side for the rest of the story. And the other girl cat replaces it. But Llewyn ofcourse abandons and then runs over the girl cat later on in a dreamlike scene. I think that scene is Llewyn metaphorically giving up on chasing fame after what happens in chicago. The girl cat was him clinging on to some hope of finding fame. But it is when he gives that up, things though still bleak start to look up for him. He gets the gig we saw at the start. Jean is less mean to him. The gorfeins take him back. He is able to overcome his partner's death. The cat returning is metaphorical of Llewyn accepting his fate I think.
                            

My thoughts on Bob Dylan's Mr. Tambourine Man

Published: November 2, 2025 | Category: Music Commentary

An analysis of Bob Dylan's 1965 classic as a reflection on fame, a fractured self, and the futility of chasing a lost past, framed as the self-dialogue of an insomniac.

Mr. Tambourine Man is often considered just a song about drugs or about chasing some elusive muse or chasing death itself for eternal freedom but to me, it always felt like a psychological self-dialogue of a weary insomniac. 

Mr. Tambourine Man is a sort of dialogue between two egos within one person. There is the tambourine man- the carefree harbinger free from the shackles of this world who can still dream. And there is the weary narrator or the singing voice. He is the other consciousness within that mind. He wants to merge with his other self, the tambourine man but everytime he reaches out to that self he fails, whether from weariness or a failure to hold on. "My senses have been stripped
My hands can't feel to grip
My toes too numb to step"
Everytime he is reminded of the physical or material world holding him back. Not allowing him to transcend. All he can do is stay there chasing the tambourine man. 

He thinks of himself as he lay in bed, an insomniac as a "shadow" chasing the tambourine man. "And if you hear vague traces of skipping reels of rhyme
To your tambourine in time
It's just a ragged clown behind
I wouldn't pay it any mind
It's just a shadow you're seeing that he's chasing" The elusive tambourine man is of course another part of his own mind but he can never reach it. Hence, he calls himself a "ragged clown", so in some part of his mind even he knows how chasing the tambourine man is a futile cause. 

The last paragraph, "With all memory and fate, driven deep beneath the waves" is him accepting the loss of his previous self. Its him accepting that he can only chase the tambourine man but never latch on. Then, "Let me forget about today until tomorrow" is him accepting that he won't ever reach the tambourine man but always keep chasing him and its his final resignation to this fate: its him accepting to survive another day in the shadow of an unreachable version of himself with whom there will be no reunion. 

At the surface, it may seem like just surrealist imagery or the chasing of a muse but I think its Dylan writing about his own feelings within a layer of his classic surrealism. Its his old self, the boy from Minnesota who is the tambourine man. That self didn't yet know what the vast world held and he was all the better for it and the narrator is the superstar Bob Dylan struggling to cope with his fame and the tours and his private life or lack thereof around the time he wrote this song in the mid 60s. Maybe in that time he tried to reach out to his former self but failed and this song is in some way reflective of that. 

But in a broader sense, it says that no matter how hard we try, we will fail if we attempt to grip onto our past self for its not truly there anymore. We chase the past like a cat would chase its own tail. It is a futile chase, we wander behind our past selves carried by the music, resigned to a neverending pursuit. 

It could be all that or maybe its just about an acid trip for all we know?
                            

Pale Dog Blues

Published: November 2, 2025 | Category: Short Fiction

A piece of surreal prose exploring themes of self-identity, delusion, and the confrontation of mortality during a heat-induced hallucination.

The air was thick, almost like fog but it was humid and very warm. I walked behind a hearse today. I don't like saying hearse, it paints a certain catholic picture of a black sedan which I'm not entirely comfortable with. I walked behind a freezing van today, I didn't want to follow it, i tried to take the other way but it somehow got ahead of me. I thought to myself, could It be my father in there? But How? He was okay this morning. I tried to go through a line of parked cars. I scraped up against our old car while doing so. I hadn't seen that thing in so long I thought. It looked faded and rustworn I thought, when I noticed the white dog. It was the same one that lived downstairs. It used to terrify me when I was little. How it used to howl, still sends a shiver down my spine. What was it doing there, it must have been long dead? It looked almost translucent in the mire. Was my mind playing tricks on me? Was I delirious from the heat? I backed out fearing the pale dog and got stuck behind that van again. I got a glance of the body through the condensed, foggy windows. I recognised its face: it seemed to be mine. When I got home, I tried washing up thinking I had gone mad from the heat but when I tried to spray water on my face, my fingers sank right through....
                            

Concerning The Motion Picture

A personal reflection on categorizing cinema — how storytelling, symbolism, and entertainment intertwine in the moving image.

I would like to mention that these categories are entirely personal and ultimately arbitrary. And as with all things there is always overlap between the categories. This is purely my opinion and not empirical in any way. With that being said, 

I think the motion pictures can be classified into three categories. Now, I dont want to sound like some self-important, elitist "cinephile" who calls movies "kino" when I say this but these three categories, to me are as follows.

Firstly, we have "movies". A movie is the kind of motion picture where, the plot and narrative are secondary to the main intent, which is entertainment. A movie serves only to be "fun" and to keep the viewer occupied for two hours. For instance, the Russo brother's avengers films- massive hits financially and as someone who has seen them, I cannot lie they were entertaining. Wondering how Iron Man and his gang were going to defeat Thanos kept me occupied for two hours. But, after the movie ended, I couldn't care less for Tony Stark. But, that apathy isn't necessarily a bad thing. The movie completed its purpose. Ultimately most so called "cinephiles" start of by watching these movies and then graduate to some deeper filmography, so movies do deserve some credit in my opinion.

Secondly, we have films. A film to me is a motion picture where narrative is king. The film doesn't want to entertain you or me. The film only has a story to tell. In a film, individual stills or oversights do not matter. The plot is what the director is most concerned with. Take for instance, Cameron Crowe's "Almost famous" which is centered around a teenage boy touring with an up-and-coming band and thats what the director is most concerned with. Films like these leave one feeling entertained, yes but also give a sense of vicarious living. A good film transports viewers to that world and makes them feel the story through and through. For instance, during Almost Famous, I almost felt as if I was also touring with the band "Stillwater" . But after the film ends, you dont stop caring about the world or the characters like you would in a movie. Instead you start seeing them through a lens of nostalgia almost as if the story actually happened to you. A good film is an exercise in vicarious living. The film transports the viewer out of the real world.

But the third kind of motion picture has the opposite effect. "Cinema" originates from a greek word for literal movement. But, when I call a motion picture "cinema" I refer to less the physical act of capturing movement and more about being physically moved. A cinema exists to make the viewer ponder. Its goal is to ask (or answer) some profound question which is rooted in the real world. Cinemas do this through the plot, so in that sense they are similiar to films but in cinema, the plot is a vessel for the symbolism or allegory. Cinemas can be interpreted differently by different viewers. For instance the Coen Brother's "Inside Llewyn Davis" is a motion picture where different viewers draw different conclusions. Some may interpet it as nihilistic and futile, others may see Llewyn's journey as absurd as per Camusian philosophy and some may simply see it as a story about a failing man. What makes cinema so great is that all of those interpretations can be true to different viewers. The reason why I think cinema is ultimate form of motion picture is because it leaves the viewer thinking for days. To me, Cinema is the "lovechild" of filmmaking and philosophy. I can watch one and my mind will be occupied on them for days. They enable critical thinking in viewers and simultaneously manage to tell a good story. 

But I think, a good director is someone who can do all three.
        

Add your thoughts on Politics and general topics here!

View All Writings

Cars

Big Healey and the Economy

Published: November 2, 2025 | Category: Auto History

An economic and automotive history of the iconic Austin-Healey series and the decline of the British car industry.

Britain- the isle where once the industrial revolution had kicked off is now a mere footnote in the automotive industry but that wasn't always the case. There was a time when British cars ruled the world. It was the 1950s and there was a new Queen in Buckingham Palace & the empire still had some grip over her colonies. Even, though the decolonisation process had begun, Britain's colonies still relied on the Empire's industries and technology. At the time, The United Kingdom was responsible for more than half of the car exports globally. British cars were ruling the world and domestically British companies were at their peak. 

In those days British Motoring was split into essentially two giants- BMC & Leyland. Names such as Austin, Morris, Mini, MG & Jaguar were under the banner of BMC while the latter had Leyland Trucks, Rover and Triumph. Competition was fierce between these corporations and as it has been proved time and time again competition breeds innovation. 

Austin, the biggest brand under the BMC banner had designed a sports car after the war called the A90 Atlantic. It was small & peppy and unlike the competition it was an actual post war design which is to say "modern" whereas its competition the Triumph Roadster which though designed in 1946 resembled something out of the 1930s. The A90 was faster than its Triumph rival and smaller but it just lacked that "muscle" factor which a British roadster needs. 

Enter: Donald Healey. Donald Healey was an RAF flight instructor, automobile designer and Monte-Carlo winning racing driver. Before the second world war he had worked for Triumph designing a racing version of their famous "Dolomite". After the war Healey struck out on his own creating the beautiful Healey "Silverstone". The Silverstone was so good the Americans particularly Nash, hired Healey to build them a sports car, the Famous "Nash-Healeys" as they were but all of Healey's ventures so far had one major issue: They were all too expensive. 

He wanted a sports car that was firstly affordable and secondly could do 100 mph. So Healey began working on a design which he presented at the Earl's court motor show in 1952. Austin's head Baron Leonard Lord loved Healey's design so much that he struck a deal with Healey right then and there. And why wouldn't he? The Austin-Healey as it would be known is simply beautiful. Very rarely in car design does the "rear wedge" style work but the Healey is an exception. The rear wedge styling gives the car an almost aggresive, animalian look. It looks like a feline apex predator ready to pounce or somehow take flight but the classical headlights and the iconic Healey grille a staple of all his cars gives it an air of opulence which is hard to compete with. Its the perfect blend of flowing style and "muscle". 

Now on to the technicals, Healey had designed the car and Austin had given its mechanical components based on the A90 but the body was built by Jensen, another now defunct British sportscar maker and sent to Austin's longbridge factory where a small but potent 2.6 litre 4 cylinder was fitted. Thus was born the Austin-Healey 100. The first of the famous "big Healeys" 

The 100 was a commercial success and a proper British roadster which outshined its competition the MG A and the Triumph TR2, both of whom were good cars in there own right. It was so good it was discontinued and replaced within 3 years of production in 1956, for the 100-6 which was virtually identical on the outside to the 100 but was better mechanically. It had 2.6 litre 6- cylinder out of the Austin Westminster. The 100-6 was an improvement upon the 100 and the 3000, the final "Big Healey" introduced in 1959 was the ultimate British sportscar of the era. The 3000 called so for its 3-litre 6 cylinder was faster, even more agressive looking and had introduced creature comforts to the Austin Healey line up. The 3000 was a roadracer like its predecessors but also a grand tourer. It would enjoy a long production cycle of 8 years and is probably the car you think of when I say "British Roadster". But then why did it die out?

Well, to understand that our automotive story needs to turn into an economic one. I started by talking of Britain's industrial might and for a time as the other european nations completely decimated by the war struggled to rebuild. Britain had flourished but by the 60s. Germany, Italy and even France had completely new factories and the once mighty kingdom just couldn't keep up. Couple that with the constant labour strikes and shortages aswell as the fallout of the Suez crisis. One begins to understand why British cars eventually failed and why the government went ahead with Nationalization of the car industry. So, by 1967 BMC and Leyland had merged to form British Leyland and Austin who by now had complete control over Austin-Healey after Donald Healey's departure to work with Jensen decided to discontinue the entire Austin-Healey lineup and name in an attempt to cut costs aswell as to not cannibalize sales of the newer MG C and Triumph TR6. So Austin-Healey the makers of the Beautiful 100, 100-6 and 3000 models passed into legend as the British car industry which it once stalwarted descended into decline.
                            

Citroën and her rise & fall

Published: November 2, 2025 | Category: Auto History

A detailed look at the French marque's history, from pioneering designs to bankruptcy and the ultimate failure of the SM.

Nowadays, perhaps Citroen are known for making small city cars but that wasn't always the case. The brand was founded in 1919 by Andre Citroën; a French industrialist and engineer. Andre had envisioned his marque as the French equivalant of Ford-Creating good cars for regular people. Models like the B12, C4 and the powerful "Rosalie" had made Citroen one of the global superpowers of the auto world in the 20s. But the brands innovation first showed in the 1934 "Traction-Avant"."Unibody" design where the the body is the chassis is now used in almost every single car but the Avant was the first to use it in mass production. The Avant was also the first mass produced front wheel drive car. Infact the Avant was so ahead of its time that designing it bankrupted Citroën who had to sell his company to Michelin.

But by the time Michelin took over completely, the German invasion of France had already begun. Hitler's armies had redirected Citroen to the Nazi war effort but Citroen's head Pierre-Joules Boulanger would not not sit still. He intentionally ordered his employees to work slow and sabotage the trucks they were making for the Wehrmacht. He also gathered some engineers to work in secret in designing actual cars.

Boulanger's efforts had put him squarely in Hitler's hitlist but because of his bravery the 2CV or "Deux Chevaux" was born just after the second world war. The 2CV was not a nice car but it was just what a half destroyed France needed. It too was a clever design. It used a version of Citroen's famous suspension for the first time. It was made to be cheap and usable and a reliable work horse quite literally the name meant "Two Horses" because it could do what two horses could do. The 2CV: A car created in secrecy in occupied France had brought France's economy back to stability.

By the early 50s, Citroen were doing well, but they lacked a modern flagship. The Traction-Avant which at one time was the most advanced car in the world had been in production for 20 years and contemporaries were catching up. So enter the : DS. Citroen's most famous car. It made full use of Citroen's self leveling Hydropneumatic Suspension. A design. which still remains forward thinking today. The DS was the first car to use modern Disc Brakes and it even had power steering in the 1950s. It was sleek, low slung and aerodynamic. Yes, Citroen pioneered the aerodynamic "teardrop shape" in the DS. 

In the 60s Citroen were still doing well and ambition struck them. They wanted to make a flagship sports car. They had intially planned on making a faster version of the DS but eventually ended up designing a whole new car. Their Vision was a V8 powered Gran tourer to rival Ferrari or Jaguar but they eventually settled on a V6 engine. To achieve their goals, Citroen bought out the struggling Maserati in 1968. They had assigned Giulio Alfieri the designer of the famous Maserati "Birdcage" to design the engine in just 6 months. Alfieri came up with a 2.7 litre V6 design based on an existing V8. Their new model was the "SM" which was styled to be modernist and sleek. It was low slung and extremely aerodynamic even for today. The SM had the most advanced version of Citroen's self leveling suspension. It had s power steering system called "DIRAVI" Which is still clever by today's standards. It had lightweight carbon enforced wheels, rain sensitive wipers and was way ahead of its time interior wise. The SM even had a top speed rivalling the Porsche 911 even though it was heavier and front-wheel drive

It was practically a "space-age" design The SM was the culmination of all of Citroen's innovation. It debuted in late 1970 and It was the ultimate Citroen but it was the right car for the wrong time. The global economy was dwindling and the 1973 oil crisis hit hard. The SM was arguably the best , most advanced car on the road but sales were low as people simply couldn't afford cars like it.

Citroen's extensive spending on the failed SM and its purchase of the bleeding Maserati meant that they were once again broke. Citroen had to file for bankruptcy again in 1975. This time being bought out by rivals Peugeot. Where Citroen led innovation Peugeot made boring, safe cars without any thrill. Yes, alot of those boring cars sold well but they lacked passion. Under Peugeot, Citroen lost alot of its charm and originality and the innovators of old were dead. Its ironic, The beautiful SM which should have been Citroen's ultimate triumph is what killed the original Citroen. Yet, cars like the 2CV, Traction-Avant and DS have become staples of France. As iconic as the "Arc De Triomphe" or "Eiffel" Tower
                            

Star Trek, Beatles and Bond

Published: November 2, 2025 | Category: Anecdote

The incredible true story of how Patrick Stewart met Paul McCartney and got to drive an Aston Martin DB5.

Jean luc Picard, a Beatle and James Bond's ride
The Aston Martin DB4 and DB5 are regarded as some of the greatest sports cars of all time and Sir Patrick Stewart certainly thought so. He was a mere theatre actor, not yet reaching stardom at the time. Stewart was appearing in a play and one of his costars was none other than Jane Asher, who at the time was dating Sir Paul Mccartney. 

As with all British people, they were at the pub one night and Stewart said that if he had a million pounds, he would buy an Aston Martin. And lo and behold some time later, the Beatles frontman shows up with the keys to his Aston Martin and hands them to the young actor to take for a joyride
                            

Share your passion for diecast, kits, and miniature motoring here!

About the Author

Hi folks, I like to write and say things from time to time and this is essentially an outlet for my thoughts. I like poetry, 60's music and old things in general

Get in touch: shahsafwat12@gmail.com